lmd_Li1989.bib

@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.95}}

@comment{{Command line: /usr/bin/bib2bib --quiet -c 'not journal:"Discussions"' -c 'not journal:"Polymer Science"' -c '  author:"Li"  ' -c year=1989 -c $type="ARTICLE" -oc lmd_Li1989.txt -ob lmd_Li1989.bib /home/WWW/LMD/public/Publis_LMDEMC3.link.bib}}

@article{1989Sci...245..513C,
  author = {{Cess}, R.~D. and {Potter}, G.~L. and {Blanchet}, J.~P. and 
	{Boer}, G.~J. and {Ghan}, S.~J. and {Kiehl}, J.~T. and {Le Treut}, H. and 
	{Li}, Z.-X. and {Liang}, X.-Z. and {Mitchell}, J.~F.~B. and 
	{Morcrette}, J.-J. and {Randall}, D.~A. and {Riches}, M.~R. and 
	{Roeckner}, E. and {Schlese}, U. and {Slingo}, A. and {Taylor}, K.~E. and 
	{Washington}, W.~M. and {Wetherald}, R.~T. and {Yagai}, I.},
  title = {{Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models}},
  journal = {Science},
  year = 1989,
  month = aug,
  volume = 245,
  pages = {513-516},
  abstract = {{Understanding the cause of differences among general circulation model
projections of carbon dioxide-induced climatic change is a necessary
step toward improving the models. An intercomparison of 14 atmospheric
general circulation models, for which sea surface temperature
perturbations were used as a surrogate climate change, showed that there
was a roughly threefold variation in global climate sensitivity. Most of
this variation is attributable to differences in the models' depictions
of cloud-climate feedback, a result that emphasizes the need for
improvements in the treatment of clouds in these models if they are
ultimately to be used as climatic predictors.
}},
  doi = {10.1126/science.245.4917.513},
  adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989Sci...245..513C},
  adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}