lmd_Li1989.bib
@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.95}}
@comment{{Command line: /usr/bin/bib2bib --quiet -c 'not journal:"Discussions"' -c 'not journal:"Polymer Science"' -c ' author:"Li" ' -c year=1989 -c $type="ARTICLE" -oc lmd_Li1989.txt -ob lmd_Li1989.bib /home/WWW/LMD/public/Publis_LMDEMC3.link.bib}}
@article{1989Sci...245..513C,
author = {{Cess}, R.~D. and {Potter}, G.~L. and {Blanchet}, J.~P. and
{Boer}, G.~J. and {Ghan}, S.~J. and {Kiehl}, J.~T. and {Le Treut}, H. and
{Li}, Z.-X. and {Liang}, X.-Z. and {Mitchell}, J.~F.~B. and
{Morcrette}, J.-J. and {Randall}, D.~A. and {Riches}, M.~R. and
{Roeckner}, E. and {Schlese}, U. and {Slingo}, A. and {Taylor}, K.~E. and
{Washington}, W.~M. and {Wetherald}, R.~T. and {Yagai}, I.},
title = {{Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models}},
journal = {Science},
year = 1989,
month = aug,
volume = 245,
pages = {513-516},
abstract = {{Understanding the cause of differences among general circulation model
projections of carbon dioxide-induced climatic change is a necessary
step toward improving the models. An intercomparison of 14 atmospheric
general circulation models, for which sea surface temperature
perturbations were used as a surrogate climate change, showed that there
was a roughly threefold variation in global climate sensitivity. Most of
this variation is attributable to differences in the models' depictions
of cloud-climate feedback, a result that emphasizes the need for
improvements in the treatment of clouds in these models if they are
ultimately to be used as climatic predictors.
}},
doi = {10.1126/science.245.4917.513},
adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989Sci...245..513C},
adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}
